Objective vs Subjective with Examples

In the previous sections, we discussed the importance of critical reading, analysis and interpretation, being open-minded, and self-regulation in developing critical thinking skills. In this section, we will explore the concepts of objective and subjective thinking and how they relate to academic research.

Objective Thinking

Objective thinking refers to a way of thinking that is based on facts, evidence, and logical reasoning. It involves looking at a situation or problem from multiple perspectives and making judgments based on the available information. Objective thinking requires individuals to set aside personal biases and emotions and to approach a topic or issue with an open mind.

For example, when conducting academic research, objective thinking involves critically evaluating the evidence and arguments presented in various sources. It requires considering different viewpoints and analysing the validity and reliability of the information. By adopting an objective mindset, researchers can make informed decisions and draw logical conclusions.

Subjective Thinking

Subjective thinking, on the other hand, is influenced by personal opinions, emotions, and biases. It is based on individual experiences, beliefs, and values. Subjective thinking can be useful in certain situations, such as when expressing personal preferences or opinions. However, in academic research, subjective thinking can hinder the objectivity and credibility of the findings.

For instance, if a researcher approaches a topic with preconceived notions or a strong personal bias, it can affect their ability to critically evaluate the evidence objectively. Subjective thinking may lead to

cherry-picking information that supports one’s own beliefs, ignoring contradictory evidence, or misinterpreting data to fit a desired outcome. These practices undermine the integrity of the research process and can lead to biased or flawed conclusions.

Examples

Let’s consider an example to illustrate the difference between objective and subjective thinking:

Suppose you are conducting research on the effects of social media on mental health. An objective approach would involve gathering data from various studies, analysing the methodologies used, and critically evaluating the evidence. You would consider both the positive and negative effects, taking into account different perspectives and expert opinions. Your conclusions would be based on the available evidence, without personal biases influencing your judgment.

Conversely, a subjective approach might involve relying solely on personal experiences or anecdotes to draw conclusions about the effects of social media on mental health. This approach would not consider the broader body of scientific evidence and could lead to biased or inaccurate conclusions.

Conclusion

Developing the ability to think objectively is crucial for academic research. It allows researchers to critically evaluate evidence, consider different perspectives, and draw logical conclusions. By understanding the distinction between objective and subjective thinking, students can enhance their critical thinking skills and produce high-quality research.

In the next section, we will explore the importance of promoting creativity in critical thinking.